The Elusive Final Payment Revisited
In my October 2008 column (pg. 10), “The elusive final payment,” I reviewed strategies for getting your final payment when doing custom building on a client’s lot. Readers from Wisconsin, Utah, Florida and Maryland wrote to me to share their methods of ensuring they get their final payment. I have highlighted a selection of their recommendations which I hope will help you obtain the sometimes elusive final payment.
But, first a brief summary of the key points from my October column:
- Try not to let your client get ahead of you when you are in the final stages of completing their project.
- Review your construction agreement and consider including some or all of the following language within it:
- Require two initial payments: The first is a deposit that is held to be applied to the final payment; the second is to fund the client’s operating account.
- Obtain the right to request funding of the operating account every 14 days and require a minimum balance in the account that is approximately 10 percent of the total projected job cost.
- Maintain the right to stop the job when a funding request is delinquent.
- Consider adding the following clause into your contract: “No funds shall be held back for issues related to quality or completeness of the construction in place.”
- My draw schedules are milestone draw schedules which call for payments on items started or delivered and never 100 percent complete. I explain what a milestone draw schedule is up front and have never had an argument about a draw being due since instituting it in 1995. Even the banks accept it. I also have a clause in my contract tying draw authorization to the bank inspection if they’re bank financing. My final draw is always submitted only after there is only 1 percent of the job left. This is all that is ever at risk for me.
- The other method I use to keep from getting stuck near the end is to simply not pay any of the finished trades until I’m funded. If the owner balks at the end — and that’s normally when they’ll go for the kill if that’s their agenda — then what they’ve really done is screwed the subs on the final. When they realize the contractor has [received] his money but the carpet company, driveway contractor, landscape contractor, etc., haven’t been paid and have the right to lien the job, it adds a fresh perspective to how their “screw the builder” plan is working out for them. Since I’ve been using these methods, I’ve had better customers and been a wiser builder. I really believe I have avoided quite a few arguments about what is due and when it is due.
This content continues onto the next page...
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »